Most companies hesitate before bringing in an interim executive, and the hesitation usually sounds the same: "Help me understand why someone this senior is available." I understand the instinct. It is easy to assume an interim executive must be between jobs or waiting for a permanent role. In reality, that assumption is almost always wrong.

Interim is not a bad word

The best interim leaders I work with are not in transition. They choose this work on purpose. They have already delivered more in their careers than most short assignments even require. What draws them to interim roles is variety, flexibility, challenge, and the opportunity to keep learning.

These leaders show up curious and adaptable. They walk into imperfect situations and learn fast because they have done it repeatedly.

Context always matters

Which brings me to another common concern: "My company’s problems are different." Different because of context, of course. But when you strip away noise, most challenges fall into familiar buckets: people, process, and technology. That pattern recognition is exactly where interim leaders bring disproportionate value. They have seen the issues before, often under more pressure and on larger stages. They know what works, where teams get stuck, and how to restore momentum.

I recently worked with a family-owned business where the finance team was six months behind on reconciliations, and audit pressure was rising. Leadership believed the issue was system complexity. It was not. It was unclear ownership and an inconsistent process. An interim Controller reset the cadence and clarified roles. Within 90 days, the books were clean, and lender confidence was restored.

That kind of turnaround does not happen because someone checks every box on a job description. It happens because the right leader focuses on the right problem at the right time.

And this is where companies often get tripped up: how they select and assess interim talent. Too often, interim executives are evaluated the same way permanent executives are. The client brings a long list of must-haves, followed by a few more for good measure. This almost always leads to overthinking and paralysis.

Interim work is different. The question is not whether someone checks every box for a long-term role. The question is whether they can solve the problem in front of you. The real must-haves are leadership, judgment, adaptability, and EQ.

Across traditional business functions, the themes are consistent. In finance, the pain points are reconciliations, closing the books, reporting, audit readiness, and investor support. In HR, the priority areas include performance management, org design, employee relations, and compensation. Across functions, companies are seeking to leverage technology better to operate more effectively.

Cost is another area full of misunderstanding.

A senior interim leader charging by the hour is not the same as a full year of salary, bonuses, equity, benefits, or overhead. You are paying for focused impact across a defined period. The cost of not solving the problem quickly is almost always higher.

Interims also play a critical role in transitions. Sometimes the right move is to bring in an interim leader to stabilize the business, set direction, and then hire a permanent executive to execute. Interims often make the hard calls and clean up legacy issues so the permanent hire can start with a clean slate.

Even when companies make the right interim choice, value still erodes in one more area: transition overlap. Companies often try to minimize costs during handoffs. Allowing meaningful overlap reduces risk, accelerates ramp-up, and creates continuity. It is an investment that pays for itself.

Interim leaders choose this work on purpose

Their availability is not a red flag. It is often a sign of career autonomy and mastery. The misconception that they are simply between roles leads companies to undervalue the very skills that make interims so effective.

Pattern recognition creates speed and clarity

Interim executives quickly identify root causes because they have solved similar problems before. That experience matters more than long lists of functional checkboxes.

Impact beats pedigree in short-term engagements

Evaluating interim hires like permanent hires slows decision-making. What matters is whether they can move the business forward right now, within a defined scope and timeline.

When you need a specialist

There are situations where industry depth or legacy system expertise truly matters. Some contexts are complex enough that bringing in someone without that background would slow things down. But these cases are the exception, not the rule. Most interim scenarios demand adaptability, clarity, and the ability to diagnose quickly, not twenty years in the same vertical.

Interim is a powerful strategy

Used correctly, interim talent is not a temporary fix. It is often the smartest strategic move. If you want to get the most value from an interim leader, anchor your evaluation on the problem you need solved, not on a permanent job description. Focus on impact, clarity, and momentum, and you will make better decisions, faster.

‍